Tyler. wrote:Emil wrote:That's the thing that makes both Green Day and Sum 41 a much better live band than blink. The actually interact with the crowd while blink tells them to yell fuck every once in a while.
errrm, sum 41 are not a good live band. they can play their shit solidly and it sounds awesome, but they have shit stage presence and don't put on that good of a show, from any video i've ever seen - and the concert i went to. blink talks and does random shit which is funny.
green day are definitely kings of the live show though. saw them in australia and it was epic
What? You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
I can't say a word about blink, since I've never seen them live or watched any clips. But to say that Sums are not a good live band? Shit stage presence? WHAT?
If you think Green Day is a good live band, then you can't say Sums suck. Sums are the almost the same, but in smaller scale. They don't have the special effects GD has, but they sure can pump up the crowd. Bringing people on stage, letting them play the instruments, crowd singing, stage dives and other ways to interact with the crowd. What more you can ask for from a band that doesn't play the 30,000-people venues every week?
You can't judge them by only one show and few clips. It's true that Sums have not always been the same as they are now. Their shows vary from era to era, so if you say that Sum 41 IS a shitty live band, you're wrong.
I've seen Sums three times, once in 2008 and twice this month, and I've seen Green Day twice too.
After the 2008 Sum-show, I thought they were nowhere near GD. But after seeing them live this year, I must say Sums' stage presence is at least as good as GD's, if not better.